# Foot\_walking profile

**URL:** https://ask.openrouteservice.org/t/foot-walking-profile/7910
**Category:** isochrones
**Created:** [April 27, 2026, 10:27am UTC](https://ask.openrouteservice.org/t/foot-walking-profile/7910 "2026-04-27T10:27:56Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![quopossum](https://ask.openrouteservice.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/q/22d042/32.png) [@quopossum](https://ask.openrouteservice.org/u/quopossum)
#### Post date: [April 27, 2026, 10:27am UTC](https://ask.openrouteservice.org/t/foot-walking-profile/7910/1 "2026-04-27T10:27:56Z")

</div>

hi,

does the default foot\_walking profile consider elevation when calculating reachability?

thank you and cheers

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jschnell](https://ask.openrouteservice.org/user_avatar/ask.openrouteservice.org/jschnell/32/971_2.png) [@jschnell](https://ask.openrouteservice.org/u/jschnell)
#### Post date: [April 29, 2026, 8:19am UTC](https://ask.openrouteservice.org/t/foot-walking-profile/7910/2 "2026-04-29T08:19:31Z")

</div>

Hey,

no, currently elevation is only displayed, not used to influence any routing or reachability results.

As elevation information has gotten a lot more precise over the last years, this is something we are planning to integrate at some point, but currently we cannot give you any timeline for that.

Best regards