# Does cycle routing profile take into account that 'Footpaths' are not ridable?

**URL:** <https://ask.openrouteservice.org/t/does-cycle-routing-profile-take-into-account-that-footpaths-are-not-ridable/1339>\
**Category:** openrouteservice\
**Created:** [February 10, 2020, 1:33pm UTC](https://ask.openrouteservice.org/t/does-cycle-routing-profile-take-into-account-that-footpaths-are-not-ridable/1339 "2020-02-10T13:33:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![abhiank](https://ask.openrouteservice.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/a587f6/32.png) [@abhiank](https://ask.openrouteservice.org/u/abhiank)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2020, 6:11am UTC](https://ask.openrouteservice.org/t/does-cycle-routing-profile-take-into-account-that-footpaths-are-not-ridable/1339/5 "2020-02-12T06:11:55Z")

</div>

> apparently not even in GH.

Yeah. Just saw that. So even GH is not using bridleway for walking and biking right now.

But coming back to my original question, atleast footpaths are not being used for biking right? How can I check that?

---

_[View the full topic](https://ask.openrouteservice.org/t/does-cycle-routing-profile-take-into-account-that-footpaths-are-not-ridable/1339)._